A supervisor filed a lawsuit against his employer after his employer terminated him for allegedly placing a concealed camera in the office. The supervisor claimed that he was unlawfully terminated on account of his sex, in violation of Title VII, and age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (which has jurisdiction over Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana) was tasked with determining whether the termination was a violation of...
R Eddie Wayland
OSHA delays enforcement of revived vaccination or weekly testing mandate
Readers will recall that we recently wrote about President Biden’s vaccine mandate which took shape in the form of an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Although enforcement of the ETS was halted by the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently revived the ETS, allowing it to go into effect. In response to the Sixth Circuit’s ruling, OSHA has delayed the deadlines for...
Biden’s OSHA vaccination mandate explained
President Biden’s vaccine mandate has taken shape in the form of an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). On Nov. 4, 2021, following direction by the Biden administration, OSHA issued an ETS requiring employers with 100 or more employees to implement a mandatory vaccination policy for their employees or have unvaccinated employees submit to weekly COVID-19 testing and wear a mask at work. On Nov. 5, 2012, one day after OSHA...
https://www.freightwaves.com/news/bidens-osha-vaccination-mandate-explained
Account executive trainees seek FLSA class certification in wage suit against freight broker
A group of account executive trainees at a freight brokerage company with facilities across the United States are seeking conditional class certification in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) lawsuit against their employer. The lawsuit alleges that the employees were not paid for all hours worked.
Background
The employer, a freight brokerage company, classified account executive trainees (employees) as exempt from overtime and paid them a regular biweekly salary. The employees filed a lawsuit...
California Supreme Court settles pay rate for missed meal, rest and recovery periods
The California Supreme Court recently addressed what the proper rate for paying missed meal, rest, and recovery periods is under California state law. The California Supreme Court concluded that the rate must be calculated using not only the employees’ base hourly rate but also a proportionate share of nondiscretionary payments, thus increasing the rate. This ruling has been applied retroactively by the court.
Background
Under California’s Labor Code, Section 226.7(c), employers are required to...
Appellate court overturns multi-million-dollar decision in driver poaching case
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (which oversees Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota) recently overturned a multi-million-dollar jury award in a case involving two major trucking companies. The case centered around “poaching” drivers, which is a term that has been given to the practice of recruiting and hiring drivers who are under a contract or restrictive covenant with another trucking company.
Background
To help combat driver...