In regard to the implementation, the International Chamber of Shipping issued a warning to shipowners and operators of the ban and reiterated the fact that any ships...
https://safety4sea.com/non-compliant-fuel-carriage-ban-enters-into-force/
In regard to the implementation, the International Chamber of Shipping issued a warning to shipowners and operators of the ban and reiterated the fact that any ships...
https://safety4sea.com/non-compliant-fuel-carriage-ban-enters-into-force/
Acceptable methods of compliance with the Marpol Annex VI are considered to be the use of fuel oil (or LNG, Biofuels, blended products distillates) used on board with a sulphur limit of less...
https://safety4sea.com/south-africas-approach-to-2020-sulphur-cap/
2020 will see several regulatory changes, with the main on being the IMO 2020 sulphur cap. However, in addition to the sulphur cap regulation, numerous other regulations will also be implemented worldwide by the IMO and ILO over the course of the year.
In order to navigate operators through the upcoming regulatory scene, Siddharth Mahajan, Loss Prevention Executive Asia, Singapore, Gard Club, provides an insight of the most important international regulations that will enter into force in 2020.
1...
https://safety4sea.com/overview-of-the-2020-shipping-regulatory-landscape/
Naval architect and marine engineering company, Foreship reports an increasing number of enquiries on how scrubbers can be equipped at short notice, after emerging market misgivings regarding the quality and availability of 0.5% sulphur content fuel oils.
As the company notes, after the implementation of the 2020 sulphur cap, companies that have opted scrubbers have a relatively smooth transition. On the other hand, the higher costs of very low sulphur fuel oils (VLSFOs), as well as concerns...
The four organisations have launched an online survey, aiming to better understand the quality of the new fuel oils and potential safety implications of the IMO 2020 sulphur regulation, and...
https://safety4sea.com/bimco-ics-intercargo-intertanko-aim-to-identify-potential-fuel-oil-problems/
The global coronavirus outbreak has triggered major financial and logistical difficulties, making Chinese shipping entities to raise concerns of their ability to comply with the IMO sulphur rules, introduced in January 2020.
China Shipowners’ Association (CSOA), comprising more than 200 member companies, have issued a draft proposal to Beijing requesting a temporary reprieve from the IMO 2020, reports by The Standard P&I Club say.
The IMO 2020 requires ships to run on fuel containing no more than...
https://safety4sea.com/chinese-shipowners-request-temporary-reprieve-from-imo-2020/
IMO Sec-Gen stated that:
Zero emission shipping requires the development, widespread availability and affordability of new...
https://safety4sea.com/imo-sec-gen-stresses-need-for-urgent-action-on-emissions/
http://mfame.guru/onboard-compliant-fuel-testing-range-launched-to-minimize-fame-risks/
As BIMCO says, the new short-term measure requires existing ships to comply with an EEXI limit, if adopted by IMO. The proposal offers a simplified way to comply by using estimated speed/power curves and...
https://safety4sea.com/bimco-joins-japan-for-regulation-of-existing-ships-carbon-intensity/
The following article, provided by the Gard P&I Club, cites the key sulphur emission limits in several designated MARPOL emission control areas (ECAs) of the world.
Recent attention has been focused on the reduction of the global sulphur cap from 3.50% to 0.50% – but don’t forget there are lower sulphur level requirements in designated MARPOL emission control areas and areas defined by regional governmental entities. Here is a round-up of such areas.
From time to time Members and clients contact...
https://safety4sea.com/regional-sulphur-emission-limits-at-a-glance/